Return to Scribble & Count HOME

Content Pages:

Services:
   Front Door

About S&C:
   Front Door

Mountain Relocation:
   Front Door

Quick-Reference:
   Front Door

Archive
   Front Door
   Client Docs
   Newsletter
   Articles/Essays
   Conference Handouts


Navigation:
Site Map
Site Index.htm
Scribble & Count logo

Hypertext Essay #2: Importance

©1997-98, 2000 by Scribble & Count, LLC.  All rights reserved.
(Written 9/97; rev. 12/98)

(This is the second essay in the series, which began with a basic introduction.)

This essay has only one purpose:
To argue the position that hypertext will affect society as much as printing has, without reducing the importance that printing has enjoyed for 500 years.
Pretty simple to state. Maybe hard to prove. You decide. But we aren't the only ones to claim it:
Bill Gates makes both of those points.

Wired magazine does (several time each issue). So did the magazine Business 2.0 in its premier issue (July 1998).

Sven Birkerts wrote an entire book on the subject. (He liked the changes printing brought, but he doesn't like these.)

Supporting citations are at the bottom of the essay.

Contents

This essay has the following sections:
   Importance of Printing
   Importance of Hypertext
   Survival of Printing
   Conclusions
   Citations
   Invitations to Dialog

The Importance of Printing

Hypertext as important as printing? What if that's only half true? Look at printing's record:
  • Mass education: I don't think that needs any explanation, but it may be necessary to point out that all the items below build on it.
  • Science & Technology (this includes such "frills" as locomotion, heating, plumbing, and electric lights): If enough people aren't well educated (and if they can't distribute their ideas for others to build on), how could we have invented all this in two hundred years (or even in two million)?
  • Democratic Government: How can we make informed decisions if we aren't knowledgeable? And how can we be knowledgeable about things more distant than our city-state without reading about them?
  • Industrial Revolution (I broke this out from science and technology because I want to go in a different direction with it): Technology allowed things to be built -- and since big things were more efficient, we centralized. We built big factories, and most people moved there in order to work. Mass education and mass media supported these concentrations.
  • Progress: The entire idea of progress requires a written record -- if we can't picture progress, we sure can't go there. Or even try.
It seems beyond dispute that these items have changed society far more than all of previous history and prehistory combined. It also seems impossible to argue that printing wasn't instrumental in each of them. Even the most scathing social critics must admit that the current situation is preferable to the ignorance, disease, discomfort, and downright misery that preceded it. The Middle Ages are idyllic only in celluloid and British Romantic art; Third World villages are "picturesque" only if you're on one side (and not the other) of the camera.

But will hypertext be nearly this important? And if so, Why?

The Importance of Hypertext

A comparison of hypertext to printing is striking:
  • Like printing, hypertext is a revolution in distribution; and, like printing, hypertext (coupled with electronic transmission) is a quantum leap in the breadth of that distribution.
  • But printing was part of a revolution that concentrated society; hypertext is part of a revolution that is dispersing society. That's just as important, but very, very different.
  • Printing caused large, stolid entities; organisms in the InfoAge are nimble and flexible.
  • Like printing, hypertext causes a revolutionary change in content.
  • Finally, if the medium is the message (see McLuhan reference at end of the essay), this change in content, disseminated far more widely than ever before, will have an impact on thought.

Let's look at each of these.

Distribution. Once the expense of installing equipment is overcome, hypertext costs less to produce and distribute than print materials. This gets hypertext to more people than print, including people who have previously been "out of the loop". Or to a more target audience than ever before. Or only to those who have requested it. And it gets there faster -- which has huge political implications.

Concentration/Dispersal. The history of Western civilization has been that of concentration: wealth (16th-17th C mercantilism), power (17th-19th C nationalism), production (18th-20th C industrialism), and demography (19th-20th C urbanization). Some mega-mergers apparently accepted, hypertext and telecommunications are reversing that: money is mobile; the Soviet Union is gone; customized production is commonplace; and telecommuting occurs between such places as Cut Bank, Montana, and Wall Street.
Note:  The merger exception is more apparent than real: largely because of telecommunications and hypertext, the constituent parts are often semi-autonomous and their structures are flexible.

Agility/Flexibility. These new entities are able to change direction rapidly. Behemoths IBM and GM reinvented themselves in time (barely) because their crises came when the Old World Order still had some validity, and they had huge resources behind them; we Americans can only hope the US will be able to do so as well. The new rules (see citations for Business 2.0; and Kevin Kelly) won't allow much of that in the future: when product life cycles are 6-24 months, and capital moves halfway around the world in milliseconds, multi-level debate and leisurely decision-making will become wistful memories.
Note:   Finding a way to inject reasoned judgement into such circumstances is a pressing, vital, and as yet unsolved problem.

Content. Some things (like complex schematics, linear arguments, and spellbinding novels) don't work as well in hypertext as in print; but news, reference works, catalogs, some training materials, and interactive/customizable presentations work much better.

Thought. It's been observed (and pretty well documented academically; see Benedict reference at the end of the essay) that literate peoples think differently from preliterate peoples: preliterates have far better memory, for example. The same readers approach hypertext much more assertively and critically than they do print, partly because they know they have some control. (Nielsen) There's reason to believe that hypertext will, slowly, bring significant changes to the ways consumers of hypertext think.

We'll consider these in detail in other essays. If they are valid, hypertext truly is a change of huge proportions.

The Survival of Printing

Of all the true believers in hypertext we know (and we meet lots of them at conferences), we're also the staunchest supporters of print.

Print can do things hypertext will never do as well -- at least not in the foreseeable future: foldouts, complex schematics, field guides, "touchy-feely" things, and anything (like philosophy, cause-and-effect, or traditional story-telling) requiring linear thought that the reader follows and analyzes.
Note:  I recently addressed an audience for which proceedings were only on CD ROM. Attendees were busily note-taking, not listening, because they didn't know how much they'd find on the CD. (Many of those who looked at the CD later felt that the resolution wasn't fine enough and that too much scrolling was required.)
Clearly print has tremendous advantages, and will for the foreseeable future. It's been noted that:

  • Attempts to put all software documentation online are rarely successful.
  • Users complain at having to scroll too much (particularly horizontally).
  • People use the hypertext features of online map software to compose a customized map -- and then print it for actual use.
  • Attempts to put traditional novels online haven't really caught on.
  • Most people still say "I love you" one of the old fashioned ways.
None of that will change any time soon.

Conclusions

Western history has been one of concentration:
  • 16th-17 C concentration of capital (mercantilism)
  • 17th-19th C concentration of political power (nationalism)
  • 19th-20th C concentration of production (industrialization)
  • 20th C concentration of population (urbanization).
Up until 1950, that is. The car began the dispersion of population (flight to the suburbs); telecommunications and hypertext are continuing that dispersion, and are dispersing the other three concentrations (production, power, and capital) as well.

That is a huge impact.

Citations

Benedict, Ruth. Patterns of Culture. 1934, numerous reprints.

Birkerts, Sven. Gutenberg Elegies. London: Faber & Faber, 1994.

Business 2.0. 1998--. Monthly. ISSN: 1080-2681. www.business2.com.

Gates, Bill. The Road Ahead, rev. ed., pp. 8f., 138ff.

Kelly, Kevin. "New Rules for the New Economy." In Wired, Sept. 1997, pp. 140-45+.

McLuhan, Marshall. The Medium Is the Message. 1967, numerous reprints.

Nielsen, Jakob. Designing Excellent Websites. Forthcoming.

Wired Magazine. Monthly. ISSN: 1059-1028. www.wired.com.

Invitations to Dialog

You can influence this discussion by sending email to: bsanders@scribble-count.com

If your company (or a group you're associated with) is located along the Colorado Front Range from Longmont to Colorado Springs (including Gilpin, Clear Creek, and Summit counties), we have a presentation available on hypertext and where we think it is going -- and we'd be happy to present it to you. We've addressed professional organizations, user's groups, and chambers of commerce -- so we can customize the material to your needs.

Please email us for further information.

Next essay in series (#3: Development)


Top

Rev. 20-Aug-00
Related Options:
   Archive FrontDoor  |  Next essay (#3, Development)  |   Previous essay (#1, Introduction)


Mtn outline(3K)

Scribble & Count™ LLC
PO Box 1490 Idaho Springs CO 80452
303/567-4646 (v)   303/567-4644 (f)   303/570-1044 (c)
Webmaster               © Scribble & Count LLC 1994-2004